The Pardu

The Pardu
Watchful eyes and ears feed the brain, thus nourishing the brain cells.
Showing posts with label Eric Bolling. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Eric Bolling. Show all posts

Friday, May 23, 2014

Fox News Garners Another "Pants Of Fire!" Ironic Since Fox Has Been Known For Policy Agains Pants on the Set

It is sad Fox News viewers don't supplant their news viewing with anything other than sitting with popcorn in bowl and tin foil hats to soak-up the Keystone Cop programming from Roger Ailes employees.

I recall an exchange with a conservative who took exception to ObamaCare regarding his thoughts of Congressional wavier. In other words, he believed member of Congress were omitted from compliance under the Affordable Care Act. After I sent the guy a copy of an article, clearly delineating members of Congress were required to enroll, the guy fired back a snippy response of , " you believe what these guys say." He further stated he asked his congressman and his congressman told him members of Congress did not have to secure coverage via the ACA. When I asked if his congressman was a Republican and implied he might have fallen for GOP lockstep lies, I never heard back from the guy. I suspect he secured an answer via a Goggle search. How naive and "tin hattish?" 

I am unabashed as I restate my position of securing news and current events from people who work for a network that prohibits women from wearing pants on the set. Now, why do you suspect such an edict is a reality over at Fox News?  Allow me to provide an answer.

USA Today September 20, 2013
"Pants were not allowed on Fox & Friends, remember?" she told former co-host Brian Kilmeade on his Fox News Radio show yesterday. (We're guessing the rule only applied to female hosts, considering we've never caught Kilmeade or Steve Doocy in a skirt.)
Some prefer images.....The Five co-host Kimberly Guilfoyle.


Fox spares no camera angles and it isn't at all surprising the network demographics indicate a heavy leaning towards thirty-somethings to high baby boomer white males.  

No problem with liberal (use intended) of thigh and legs shots on camera, but I relish in the fact those who expose are not bringers of information that I absorb. Since we are on the topic, the pictured host, recently delivered a message craftily written by writers and delivered via Fox New production.

The Truth-O-Meter Says:
Kimberly Guilfoyle on Wednesday, May 21st, 2014 in a broadcast of "The Five" on Fox News

Guilfoyle: Obamacare is 'one big fat VA'

The uproar over allegations of secret waiting lists at a Veterans Administration hospital in Phoenix, and delays that potentially cost veterans their lives has opened the Obama administration to criticism that it was slow to respond to the VA’s own internal reports.
Some also see a connection between troubles at the VA and the president’s signature health care law, the Affordable Care Act.
On Fox News’ The Five, four of the show’s pundits built the case that if Obama digs deeply into the VA, it will raise more questions than he would like about how the Affordable Care Act is structured.
When a Fox News panelist described the VA as a "single-payer" system (where the financing of health care is run through the government), co-host Kimberly Guilfoyle chimed in.
"If he (Obama) shines a light on that, if we actually have some illumination there, then you're going to see this is really what the rest of you all are going to get: One big fat VA system in the form of Obamacare," Guilfoyle said.
Using the same logic, co-host Eric Bolling later claimed that 500 people per year "are going to die waiting" for treatment because of Obamacare.
Bolling’s claim has some fundamental problems -- we’ll address them in a bit -- but here we’re fact-checking Guilfoyle’s claim that Obamacare amounts to "one big fat VA system."
Obamacare: One big fat VA system
The VA owns hospitals. Its doctors, nurses and technicians are government employees. The people who get care at VA facilities have served in the armed forces. These facilities are not open to the general public, and Congress appropriates the funds that keep the VA running.
Under the Affordable Care Act, the government works with private insurance companies and health care providers to provide health care coverage. The government subsidizes insurance premiums for some people and sets minimum standards for insurance policies.
But the health care system remains in the private sector. Private sector providers get paid by insurance companies and patients. There are thousands of private providers and hundreds of insurance plans operating in hundreds of markets across the country.
In the case of Medicaid, the government plays the role of the insurance company and pays private providers based on a set reimbursement schedule.
Some notes about the Affordable Care Act:
  • Employers will continue to provide health insurance to the majority of Americans through private insurance companies.
  • The government has not seized control of hospitals or nationalized doctors.
  • The law does not include the public option, a government-run insurance plan that would have competed with private insurers.
We asked health care experts to assess the similarities and differences between the VA and the Affordable Care Act. The bottom line: it’s apples and oranges.
Tom Buchmueller, who spent a year on Obama's Council of Economic Advisors and teaches at the University of Michigan, said he struggles to see any similarity at all. "Coverage through the exchanges is private insurance," Buchmueller said. 
Tom Getzen at Temple University said the VA is much like the institution that the veterans were once part of. "It’s an army," Getzen said. "In contrast, Obamacare is a complex legislative creation (with) the exchanges, expanded Medicaid and regulation."
Getzen said, to call Obamacare the same as the VA "is kind of like saying your farm program is a post office." They both have government ties, but they’re fundamentally different and are operated differently. 
Scott Harrington, an adjunct scholar with the conseravtive American Enterprise Institute and a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School, described the changes under Obamacare as a step in the direction of a government-run health care system. "But it’s a long way from getting there," Harrington said.
The idea that the Affordable Care Act was a "government takeover of health care" was named as PolitiFact’s 2010 Lie of the Year.
500 people dying a year from Obamacare
Bolling took the comparison a step further, saying the sort of delays that took place at the VA in Phoenix would repeat themselves under Obamacare, with 500 people dying a year as a result.
"President Obama wanted to insure 40 million new people under Obamacare," Bolling said.
At the VA, he continued, the typical veteran has 13 appointments each year. Bolling applied that to 40 million new patients.
"You're talking 585 million visits, half a billion visits," Bolling said. "If people are dying, how many people are going to die in Obamacare? Do the math. It will be about 500 people per year that are going to die waiting -- apples to apples."
While we won’t fact-check Bolling’s prediction, we do think it’s important to point out two problems with Bolling’s math for people who saw the segment. First, the Congressional Budget Office projects that through 2024, 26 million people will gain coverage under the Affordable Care Act. So Bolling exaggerated the base number by about 50 percent.
Second, the experts we reached said veterans have very different needs than the general population. Part of the massive growth in the VA workload stemmed from disorders related to traumatic brain injury and from the lingering effects of the Vietnam War defoliant Agent Orange. Bolling doubled or even tripled the number of doctor appointments of typical Americans, experts told us.
"The average in the U.S. is between four and six," Getzen said. The U.S. Census Bureau reports that the average number of visits fell from 4.8 a year in 2001 to 3.9 in 2010.
Point being: The math Bolling used to reach his prediction is quite flawed.
Our ruling
Guilfoyle said Obamacare is "one big fat VA system." We found no health policy expert who agreed with that comparison. The VA is owned and operated by the federal government. Its staff are government employees. In contrast, Obamacare builds upon the existing private sector health industry. The law sets standards for insurance and health care providers and it subsidizes premiums. Washington does run the Medicaid insurance program but even under that program, it is paying private providers.
We rate the claim Pants on Fire.

Thursday, May 8, 2014

Colbert and Stewart: Fox News and Eric Bolling

If you are a regular over on the Daily Kos, you've seen the following. If you are not a regular, you should consider spending a few minutes with "pure' unadulterated political humor!

Last night, Stephen Colbert had a short but still great segment mocking Fox News's Eric Bolling for making up shit in relation to Benghazi just in order to try and smear Obama, before he was caught by his own Fox News colleague.


ERIC BOLLING: There's one more piece to this. Don't forget that this was prior — prior — to Osama bin Laden being taken down, and the thought was, and the discussion was, is President Obama going into the re-election soft on terror or not? A lot of people were saying....  It was after?

DANA PERINO: Yeah, yeah, yeah. A year.

ERIC BOLLING: My bad, I take it back.

DANA PERINO: But a great point if it were true.
hysterical audience laughter and applause)

Yes. That's undeniable. Yes, a great point and a fantastic new motto: Fox News, Fair & Balanced. A Great Point If It Were True.
Video and full transcript below the fold.
Folks, if you follow the news, you know that Benghazi has been blowing up again because of a scandalous new memo linking the Obama administration directly to things said by members of the Obama administration.  And Fox News's The Five's the Eric Bolling has an ironclad explanation for why they did whatever it is we're accusing them of having done after the Benghazi attack.
ERIC BOLLING: There's one more piece to this.  Don't forget that this was prior — prior — to Osama bin Laden being taken down, and the thought was, and the discussion was, is President Obama going into the re-election soft on terror or not?  A lot of people were saying....  It was after?
DANA PERINO: Much after.
ERIC BOLLING: Was it after?
DANA PERINO: Yeah, yeah, yeah.  A year.
ERIC BOLLING: My bad, I take it back.
GREG GUTFIELD: Next on The Five....
DANA PERINO: But a great point if it were true.
 (hysterical audience laughter and applause)

Yes. That's undeniable.  Yes, a great point and a fantastic new motto: Fox News, Fair & Balanced.  A Great Point If It Were True.
(wild audience cheering and applause)
Still, I gotta give a wag of my finger to Dana Perino.  Why did you correct him?  Bolling was pulling a passionate heartfelt conspiracy theory straight out of his ass!  You don't interrupt a man in mid-yank, that's rude!  (audience laughter)  Just say, "Great point."  Because Bolling was right, up to a point.  Obama not having caught bin Laden at the time of the Benghazi attack would have made him look soft on terror, if time happened in that order.  (picture of clock winding backwards)
So Dana, come on, give your colleagues a break.  They've been talking about Benghazi non-stop for 20 months.  You can't expect them to remember the exact date that it happened.  I mean, when was it anyway?
Oh, September 11th.  Well, how on Earth are you supposed to never forget that?  We'll be right back.
Stephen started off the show with a segment about a vibrating pill to relieve constipation... and T-Mobile.
He then looked at the right-wing attacks on Obama over the issue of Russia and Ukraine.
Meanwhile, Jon looked at the media already talking about the 2016 elections.
Jordan Klepper then went to West Virginia to note how some attitudes have changed about regulating certain kinds of pollution after the chemical spill in their drinking water.
Stephen talked with The New Yorker editor David Remnick, and Jon talked with actor Seth Rogen.


Thursday, July 14, 2011


Eric Bolling!!!!

The following needs no commentary. It is typical of the people employed by Fox News. This guy will make an appropriate replacement for Beck.

"America was certainly safe between 2000 and 2008," he said. "I don't remember any attacks on American soil during that period of time." Nobody on the panel challenged this comment.

Life on Fox is like a box of Chocolate  LINKED

This is sort of commentary and reporting is what the Fox audience relishes. StumbleUpon