The Pardu

The Pardu
Watchful eyes and ears feed the brain, thus nourishing the brain cells.
Showing posts with label Marc Lamont Hill. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marc Lamont Hill. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 12, 2016

CNN Broadcast Their Chief Racist (No Host Intervention)

CNN has again entertained their conservative viewers with the most racists media contributor allowed on US airways. Harry Houck, former NYC cop, has well surpassed Pat Buchanan is an overt racist who should be denied opportunity to spew unqualified data to support his racism. We have captured and posted the CNN segment below. As you listen to Houck, try to retain the thought he quotes data which may have been influenced by "Stop and Frisk" policies which target blacks and Latinos. 


A non-bound show host would have requested more about the data Houck spewed. A real journalist (VS a host from a popular and elitists NYC family)  would have asked not only about the genesis of the data, they would have referenced the data with "stop & frisk" as a dark cloud over NYC police enforcement. By default and due to a lack of journalistic acumen Chris Cuomo facilitated Houck's racism.

“In New York City alone, blacks are 23 percent [of the population],” he said. “They make up 75 percent of all shootings, 70 percent of all robberies, 60 percent of all violent crimes. White only 3 percent. That is why there are more blacks in jail than there are whites.” 
After some back and forth, CNN commentator and former HuffPost Live host Marc Lamont Hill weighed in, “Harry just went on national TV and said black people are prone to criminality.” 
“Well, they are.” Houck said. 
“You think black people are prone to criminality?” Hill asked. “You don’t mean to say that. I’m going to give you a chance to correct [yourself]. You don’t mean that black people are prone to criminality.” 
“The statistics here show this,” Houck fired back, pointing at his sheet of statistics. “What does this say?”

Houck has a history with CNN that seems to unfold when CNN needs an arch conservative (apparent racist) for comment.  In October 2015, we published this piece with Houck rationalizing cop abuse.  CNN found another opportunity to expose its conservative audience to Houck in December 2015. In February of this year, Houck was again booked on a CNN segment as the lone voice of that portion of the white America which feeds off social regressivism: Beyonce tour

Crooks & Liars also published a piece with a bit more detail with a closing remark which is the bottom-line on Houck. He should be closed out of US media. He is without question a racist and he is the product of a corrupt law enforce community which for decades abused minorities. Houck was again allowed on CNN to spew data without any qualifying of the data as being that of a police dept. which target black and Latino men.

CNN's Harry Houck Claims Black People Are 'Prone To Criminality'

CNN started the day with a feverish argument, thanks largely to their guest, the inflammatory ex-police officer, Harry Houck. Marc LaMont Hill, a regular pundit, a professor at Moorhouse College and reasonable person whenever Houck appears on CNN, first clarifies the problem. HILL: I think we have to reject the ninety-nine percent of cops are good…

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Ferguson Murder: Black On Black Crime, Lack Of A Father, Chicago Killings. Relevance To Mike Brown's Death Please?

I saw the video that follows today. I often criticize on-air hosts who fail to properly manager segment guests. My criticism of CNN and the producers of Brooke Baldwin's segments generally based on what appears as efforts to titillate where there is no need for viewer arousal. My criticism over the past few days included the decision to broadcast a semi-anonymous audio supporter of the Ferguson Missouri killer in police officer uniform. The radio caller ("Josie") called the St. Louis areas most conservative radio host (a veritable local Limbaugh).  A supportive caller who decides to cal a local Right-wing talking head vs. a local nonpartisan radio of television station, is suspect in and of itself.  My concern with Baldwin and her producers relates to their choice of labeling the dead kid as a "taunter" (You won't shoot me) without the prospect of use of the word "alleged taunter." Thus, providing a degree of veracity to an unsubstantiated story.

Today's CNN segment pitted a noted conservative mouthpiece against a noted liberal pundit.  I have to admit a degree of appreciation for the manner in which Baldwin managed her guest. She even allowed the "over-talking" and raised voice conservative his share of the available airtime. 

Conservatives who go on air with versions of the Gish Gallop (takeover the discussion) technique draw my ire. 

The Gish Gallop is the debating technique of drowning the opponent in such a torrent of small arguments that their opponent cannot possibly answer or address each one in real time. More often than not, these myriad arguments are full of half-truths, lies, and straw-man arguments - the only condition is that there be many of them, not that they be particularly compelling on their own. They may be escape hatches or "gotcha" arguments that are specifically designed to be brief, but take a long time to unravel. Thus, galloping is frequently used in timed debates (especially by creationists) to overwhelm one's opponent.
It is so silly to see people with no viable argument fish around for easy picking points that add no value to the dialogue. The conservative mouthpiece in the video does not care one iota about the kid shot multiple times in Ferguson, Missouri. He deflects his typically conservative and feeble argument to "black on black" crime and a lack of father figures in some black families. Black on black crime is a major problem in the United States, but hardly relevant in a conversation about a white police officer killing a teenager who happened to be black. I should add, "black on black crime" is factually a conservative dog-whistle as surely as Newt Gingrich often states "Food stamp" and Paul Ryan's "Inner City Culture." If you are one who has a deep level of inquisitiveness regarding conservative use of "black on black" crime, Tim Wise offers a compelling treatise.

As I watched Marc Lamont Hill dissect and discard the argument from the Right, I marveled at the concerted efforts by Baldwin's conservative guest to squirm away from the segment focus.

Media Matters

Watch Marc Lamont Hill Blast Racial Canards Used To Distract From Brown Shooting

Hill: Issues Like "Black-On-Black" Crime, Black Fatherhood, And Chicago Violence Have Nothing To Do With Police Shootings

From the August 20 edition of CNN's Newsroom: