The Pardu

The Pardu
Watchful eyes and ears feed the brain, thus nourishing the brain cells.
Showing posts with label Stephen D. Foster. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephen D. Foster. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

GOP Again Trounces on Equal Pay (For Women)

Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was the first bill signed by President Obama after he was inaugurated as the 44th President of the United States of America. 

After working well over 40 years in Human Resources management, I can attest to women and minorities are generally paid less than their white male coworkers. While the pay practices may not show in employee to employee pay reviews, rest assured data will validate as follows. The Society For Human Resources Management (SHRM) published related concise and thorough piece in June 2013. 

NPR
The NPR chart is precise in illustrating across the board pay inequity regardless of race, ethnicity and in aggregate ("Total").

Of course, the unfair and unequal pay practice may result for unintentional administration of compensation policy, but I suggest the inequality is far more nefarious. Yes, the good old boys network is alive and well with daily exercise of unfair hiring practices, less promotions for some employees, and unfair/ inequitable compensation practices.  

Regardless of pay inequity reasons, corporations have fostered and maintained pay practice policies that since the beginning of the "pay-check" has prohibited employees from discussing their pay. Lily Ledbetter work for am employee for the great portion of her working life. Her dedication to her employer and customers resulted in promotion to the level of lower (first level) management. It is safe to assume she was far beyond ab average to below average employee. 

The essence of Ms. Ledbetters grievance with her employer was based on a "note" left for her from (implied via her lawsuits) a male co-worker with an indication he knew he was paid at a higher rate of pay. Her legal battles also included documentation she received performance evaluation comparable to her male coworkers and she was free of any corrective action that could have led to a lower level of pay. In other and much more direct words, "she was an equal regarding her employment with only a difference in gender."




For many years adherence to the "do not discuss pay" policy provided opportunity and platform for the very pay discrimination levied against Ms Ledbetter. If you know pay practices and employer benefits, you know Ms Ledbetter not only suffered less payday-to-payday earnings, her total compensation related to retirement, 401K Plan (matching dollars). She probably was out of millions as she worked towards retirement.

Throughout pay history the GOP has proven not a friend of equal pay for equal work. The US Senate via "lock-step" ideology and votes has blocked a vote on the Paycheck Fairness Act on three previous occasions. Yesterday was the third successful obstruction.

If you need validation of the pure subterfuge and malfeasance from the GOP take a look at a tweet from the Republican National Committee (RNC) from early September.


View image on Twitter
This , the White House & Democrats believe paying women less than men is an acceptable practice.
StumbleUpon

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Compares Latinos To Donkeys !

Repost from Addictinginfo Dot Org. 

Creative Commons License

Read more


Republican Speaker Compares Latinos To Donkeys At Anti-Immigration Reform Rally (VIDEO)

Author July 17, 2013 6:50 pm

Logo of the Second International Congress of Eugenics, 1921, a reminder of where the ideas of xxx have their root.
Logo of the Second International Congress of Eugenics, 1921, a reminder of where the ideas of xxx have their root.
Republicans have made no secret of the fact that they really hate the hispanic community. Despite losing the 70 percent of the hispanic vote in the 2012 Election, House Republicans have absolutely refused to pass the comprehensive immigration reform bill passed in the Senate, and conservatives across the nation have been foaming at the mouth to primary any Republican who votes for or endorses the legislation. It is a known fact that the GOP needs to do something to gain an increase of support among Latinos or they risk losing elections by large margins in the future. But many Republicans refuse to vote for any bill that gives a path to citizenship to 11 million undocumented immigrants. Since the argument for reform began, the GOP has demonstrated a clear hatred of Latinos that has spilled into the open. From voter ID laws meant to suppress Latino voters to claims that Latinos have lower IQs than white people, to using the term “wetback,” conservatives don’t seem to care that their political existence is on the line. It was only a matter of time before racism would rear it’s ugly head again, and now it has.

During a “jobs” rally turned anti-immigration reform rally just steps away from the Capitol Building in Washington DC, a conservative speaker sang the praises of racial purity and compared Latinos to donkeys, saying that inter-breeding with them would stain the DNA of white Americans. Apparently that is a major reason why conservatives don’t support immigration reform, because it will lead to inter-breeding that will hurt the white race, and therefore the conservative voter base.
According to the Rachel Maddow Show, a reporter from The Nation magazine caught a not-yet identified speaker on tape saying the vile words which are as follows:
From those incredible bloodlines, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington, and John Smith, and all of these great Americans, Martin Luther King Jr., these great Americans that built this country, you came from them. And the unique thing from being from that part of the world, when you learn about it, you can’t breed Secretariat to a donkey and expect to win the Kentucky Derby. You guys have incredible DNA , and don’t forget it.
Here’s the video via MSNBC:
To this conservative speaker, white Americans are prized racehorses and Latinos are donkeys that need to be prevented from breeding with each other to avoid tainting the DNA pool.
High profile Republicans Rep. Steve King of Iowa, Senator Ted Cruz of Texas, and Alabama Senator Jeff Sessions were all in attendance at the rally and spoke at the event. All are major opponents of immigration reform. Will any of them denounce this clear instance of racism? Or do they share the same sentiments?
The Republican Party is no longer valid political party in the United States. The GOP values ideas that belong in the 1800s and clearly rejects the diversity of America that has made this country great. Overt racism will certainly not help Republicans in the long term as demographics swiftly change and the conservative base of white voters slowly shrinks and disappears. It’s a numbers game that minority voters are winning. Combine the growing power of minorities with the white voters who support Democrats and it’s a recipe that spells doom for the GOP. At this point, even if Republicans pass immigration reform in the House it will not help them with Latinos because the GOP has crafted a clearly anti-immigration message and will thus only be viewed as reluctantly passing the bill out of sheer desperation for political viability, proving that Republicans never cared about Latinos all along. And the words spoken at the DC rally embodies exactly how Republicans feel about Latinos.

Read more
StumbleUpon

Saturday, July 6, 2013

Addictinginfo, Stephen D. Foster, and The US Confderacy

Re-posted from Addictinginfo.org.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.

A piece that echoes the reality of a continuing confederacy in the United States. A confederacy that is the tool of plutocrats and greedy politicians, the tadpole pool of the gullible and an anvil for the nation.


How Southern States Are Harming America And What We Can Do About It

Author July 5, 2013 4:27 am

south2
There are currently two versions of America operating in this nation. One comprises the states in the North, the other, the states in the South. At first glance, the average visitor wouldn’t notice much of a difference. After all, we nearly all speak the same language, eat the same kinds of foods, share common histories, customs, religions, wear similar clothing, and enjoy the same sports. The only thing that seems to be dividing us is politics and how we view government. In the South, conservatives are in control. Fear and hatred of the federal governments run rampant, which leads to the election of those who want to dismantle it. In the North, liberals are the majority. Government is generally viewed as a bastion for the common good, which leads to the election of those who seek change to advance the country and solve its problems. The question is, can these two visions of governing co-exist or do we have a problem that only separation of the union can solve?

In an article published on Alternet, an argument is made explaining why allowing Southern states to secede would be good for America as a whole. But is this a viable option, or just a fantasy of what a perfect world would look like?

It is clear that there are major differences between the North and the South. The South is anti-union while the North is largely pro-union. The South is anti-choice while the North is pro-choice. The South is anti-gay while the North is rapidly expanding gay rights. Religious fundamentalism is more prevalent in the South than it is in the North. The South is still fighting the Civil War while the North has moved on. Furthermore, Southern states oppose gun regulations, government health care, increased voting rights, lower taxes, do not fund public education as much as they should, and are profoundly more racist. To be sure, lower taxes appeal to just about every American, but when the nation has a debt problem, it is the liberal North that generally supports raising taxes as part of the solution to debt issues. And even though all Americans support Second Amendment rights, the liberal North realizes that common sense regulations can prevent gun violence without infringing on gun rights. And there is no doubt that racism can be found in every state in the nation. It’s just that the South has a deep-seated history of it. 
The main argument for allowing the Southern states to secede is that the South is dragging the nation down. Because the South is anti-union and anti-worker’s rights, they offer foreign nations cheap labor which brings in jobs at the expense of Northern industry. Cheaper labor leads to cheaper products, which means Southern businesses will rake in more demand. The core example used to show this is the American auto industry which is based in Michigan. Since the South is able to offer cheap labor to foreign auto-makers, they can sell cheaper cars to the American public resulting in less American made cars being purchased by consumers. This is a major problem if you support worker’s rights and strong American industry. How can we have strong protections for workers and revive American industry if Southerners are constantly willing to work for far less money and fewer protections? As Alternet notes, by voting for conservative politicians and conservative policies, Southerners are voting against their own interests and as a result, “also have “inferior health and pension plans, less job security, higher risk of being fired for trivial reasons, and diminished safety precautions. …” But the question is, wouldn’t the cheap labor policies still hurt the North even if separation occurs? I assume foreign countries and businesses will still prefer the cheap labor of the South and unless tariffs are enacted, I’m betting Northerners will still buy the cheap goods produced by Southern industry. 
Another argument for separation involves the amount of taxpayer dollars that go to red states (the South) versus blue states (the North). According to Alternet, the South, “home to nine of the nation’s 10 poorest states, is rabidly against government spending, yet all of its states get far more in government subsidies than they give back in taxes.” In short, conservative states are welfare states that benefit from the tax paying blue states. As it turns out, liberals have been supporting conservatives financially this whole time and not the other way around. That means conservative states are parasites even while they accuse liberal states of being lazy. 
The argument concludes that if separation were to become a reality, both sides would be happier and everyone would prosper in their own way. Blue states could keep their policies and tax dollars and red states can keep screwing over their uneducated populace and maintain their conservative policies. 
So would separating into two different countries solve our problems? The answer is, no. Yes, the North and South are divided along political, economic, and social lines. But that will not make both sides happier. The problem with this argument is that there are conservatives in the North, and there are liberals in the South. Is the South going to transfer political opponents to the North and vise versa? Certainly not. What would more than likely occur is that the South will likely oppress liberals, African-Americans, Latinos, and women in worse ways than they do now. The only thing stopping them from doing so currently is federal law and the judicial system. Sure, the Supreme Court wrongly gutted the Voting Rights Act, which will allow Southern states to suppress the vote of those they hate even more than in the last 40 years. But remedies still remain to challenge oppression and suppression. It’s wrong to abandon half of the nation’s citizenry simply because we disagree. 
Another point to make is that if we allow separation to occur, the blood spilled by 600,000 Americans during the Civil War would mean nothing, especially Northern soldiers. Should we really invalidate a hard won victory for civil rights and Union by allowing the South to leave 150 years later? Wouldn’t that allow the South to go full on state’s rights and return back to the kind of way of life (segregation, Jim Crow, etc…) that contradicts the Constitution in every way? The Civil War was fought for a damn good reason. It settled the question of slavery and so-called state’s rights for good. The South needs to get over it and move on. 
Another reality to consider is that conservatives currently control state governments in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, New Hampshire, Maine, Iowa, Idaho, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Indiana. These are Northern states. So even if North and South separated, it wouldn’t render conservatives and conservative policies extinct, including the economic policies that are dragging the nation down. In fact, it is more likely that the same destructive conservative policies would continue and anti-voting policies combined with ridiculous redistricting maps could result in Northern states such as Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin to turn red and continue to cause the same divisions in Congress and could even place a Republican in the White House. What then? Do we merge back with the South? Or do we transfer those new red states to the South as well? The whole idea of separation sounds very messy now. It can also be dangerous. 
Conservatives are very fearful and paranoid, especially of liberals. That’s because they’ve been brainwashed by Republican politicians to see liberals and Democrats as the greatest enemy of freedom on the homefront. That being said, it is likely that eventually the South will strongly consider going to war against their liberal neighbors in the future to protect what they call freedom. There is not an ocean separating the North and South. We are landlocked, and thus would be right next to each other the same way Israel is with Palestine. So it’s not out of the question to see war breaking out, because once we are separated, the differences will only become greater, leading to guaranteed conflict. As Alternet points out, there is no other subject that Southerners express their patriotism more than on war and the military. Combined with rampant religious fanaticism, that kind of patriotism will lead to bloodshed the likes of which this nation hasn’t witnessed since the Civil War. What will we do to prevent that? Turn states like Kentucky and Tennessee into a no-man’s land? 
Separation is not the solution to our nation’s ills. The only real solution to our problems is the American people themselves. We have the power to settle these political battles between liberals and conservatives. Not only do we need to start voting more intelligently and in greater numbers, we need to wage a movement to change people’s minds. One ideology is wrong. That much is clear considering the conditions in the South due to extreme conservative policies. Southern voters have the power to change these policies, but that starts with education, either by school or by life experience. By life experience, I mean the federal government could strip benefits from Southern states and show the people of that region what a hell hole their elected officials have turned their states into. The results of losing all government funding would be disastrous to the South. And when people start to lose things, they get angry at who represents them. Conservatives in Southern states have been able to use government funding to hide what their policies have actually done. That should end. And when it does, the fireworks will begin. 
But separation is a bad idea for another reason. In states across the South, demographics are constantly changing. The old guard is dying off, while the idealistic youth are becoming more powerful politically. Not only that, women are waking up to how their state governments are trying to legislate their bodies and African-Americans are mad as hell about more restrictive voting rights. On top of that, demographics are changing because of increased Latino populations. For example, the Latino population is growing so rapidly in Texas that it is believed that Texas will turn blue as early as a decade from now, maybe earlier. Even Florida is turning a deeper shade of blue. That change has resulted in Florida flipping to the Democratic column in the last two Presidential elections despite voter suppression efforts by the conservative controlled state government. A liberal Texas would tip the scales on the electoral map and if you add Florida, Republicans may never again occupy the White House unless they change their policies or stoop to illegal means to win it. Why give up on America now when the long-term looks so promising? 
The relationship between North and South is a long and complicated one. Although both have many things in common, the differences between the two haven’t been so fever pitched since the Civil War and Civil Rights eras. But change does and will happen. It always does. At one time, the South voted Democratic and hated Republicans. Then Democrats changed their positions and the result was a nation transformed by liberal policies. Out of that, we got the Voting Rights Act, the Civil Rights Act, the Clean Water and Clean Air Acts, Title IX, the Environmental Protection Agency, several landmark Supreme Court rulings such as Roe v. Wade and Brown v Board of Education, Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, and a whole host of other pieces of legislation that has shaped the America in which we live. 
Republicans, divided as they are now, morphed into a party of conservatives and have grown in strength over the last 60 years. But once again, change is on the horizon. It’s going to take a grassroots movement to combat conservative bad ideas, and a changing demographic will only aid that movement. Conservatives will either change their policies, or they face certain political doom, and the new liberal majorities in southern states will drag them kicking and screaming into a new American era. During the most divisive time in American history when Southern conservatives and Northern liberals couldn’t be more different, Abraham Lincoln once said that “You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.” That adage holds true today. Conservative politicians are fooling the good citizens of the South, and it’s up to liberals across the country to convince them to open their eyes. America should be one nation as our Founding Fathers intended. We cannot separate and pretend to be one nation dedicated to liberty and freedom while our southern brothers and sisters are oppressed in their new separate nation. It just won’t work and considering it amounts to giving up on America. 
Read more from Addictinginfo  
StumbleUpon

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

SHOTS FIRED NEAR WHITE HOUSE


UPDATE

November 16, 2011
This picture provided by the U.S. Park Police shows an undated image of Oscar Ortega-Hernandez. Police believe he is connected to reports of gunfire near the White House last Friday.

Suspect taken into custody from last weekend's shots fired near White House.

CBC News /World (linked)

Previous Article

GLOBAL GRIND REPORTS......

Shots Fired Near White House! (DETAILS)

News has just broken that gunshots have been fired near the White House on Constitution Avenue in Washington DC.
A suspect with an AK47 fired shots before causing a police chase which in turn caused Constitution Ave. between 15th and 17th streets to be shut down.
The gunfire took place approximately 700 yards from the Executive Mansion, before the suspect jumped out of his car at 23rd Street and Constitution Ave. abandoning his vehicle, reported to be a Honda with Idaho license plates. A second vehicle is also reported to be involved.
The suspect is at large and the machine gun has been recovered and appears to be equipped with a scope.
Story developing...


Read more: http://globalgrind.com/news/washington-dc-shooting-ak47-constitution-avenue-photos#ixzz1dSUZX4xB





UPDATE from www.Addictinginfo.org
LINK


Addictinginfo.org will provide on-going coverage. Apparently the gunman is at large.
StumbleUpon