The Pardu

The Pardu
Watchful eyes and ears feed the brain, thus nourishing the brain cells.
Showing posts with label Trickle down. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Trickle down. Show all posts

Sunday, May 17, 2015

Jeff Carlson: The Insanity of Trickle Down And False GOP Governance

Friend of the TPI...Jeff Carlson

The Party of Scrooge - History of American Politics's photo.


It is shameful that the media, or conservatives for that matter, will not admit that Republicans are not deluded in thinking that turning over the wealth of the nation to the rich, Wall Street, and corporations will ever create economic prosperity for the masses.

It is always stunning that Republicans have any support for their economic agenda among the population, at any level. Even in states with Republican legislatures and governors suffering monumental economic failures from pro-corporate policies advanced by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) that keep wages low, slash safety nets, cut education, and impose socially conservative policies, voters dependably flock to conservative candidates. If the 2014 midterms were any indication, it appears that residents in failed Republican states are either dirt stupid, or truly believe that revenue-killing tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy driving spending cuts and debt are the population’s path to prosperity.

Kansas has received its share of attention for its epic trickle down failure typical of conservative economics, and it is duly warranted. However, the governor of Kansas has not been tapped by the Koch brothers as their preferred Republican presidential candidate for 2016.

That distinction goes to Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker who has his state’s financial demise keeping pace with Kansas for the top Republican economic failure. Hopefully Americans are paying attention to the portent of another massive national economic failure if Republicans control Congress and the White House according to the disaster in Wisconsin.

Link to Article:

Jeff 2015

Sunday, April 28, 2013

Income Inequality Part I: A Worldwide Problem With Major US Fissure
Income inequality is not a economic phenomenon restricted to the United States.  It is a worldwide reality with inequality in some countries sitting at the high-end of the scale; surpassing indicators of other countries. In all cases except the nations of  Scandinavia and a few other nations, the less fortunate denizens of nations live vastly different lives from the wealthy.  The spectrum spans lavish opulence to overwhelming poverty and death, the numbers are stark and revealing.

Gfmag Dot Com published an interactive world map of income inequality.  The map is supported via use of the the GINI Index.

GINI index

Gini index measures the extent to which the distribution of income or consumption expenditure among individuals or households within an economy deviates from a perfectly equal distribution. A Lorenz curve plots the cumulative percentages of total income received against the cumulative number of recipients, starting with the poorest individual or household. The Gini index measures the area between the Lorenz curve and a hypothetical line of absolute equality, expressed as a percentage of the maximum area under the line. Thus a Gini index of 0 represents perfect equality, while an index of 100 implies perfect inequality.

Wealth Distribution and Income Inequality by Country Data is from the World Bank Development Indicators.
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Share Alike
Other widely used measures of economic inequality are the percentage of people living with under US$2 a day (at 2005 international prices) and the share of national income held by the wealthiest 10% of the population.
According to World Bank data, income inequality tends to be lower in Northern Europe, with countries such as Sweden, Norway and Finland showing some of the world's lowest GINI coefficients. It is also surprisingly low in much less affluent countries like Afghanistan and Ethiopia. 
The highest levels of income inequality were found, in the last decade, in countries such as the Central African Republic, Honduras, Angola, Haiti, South Africa and Namibia.

In the late 2000s, Chile had the highest GINI coefficient, after taxes and transfers, among OECD member countries. The United States, Turkey and Mexico came right before it.
The highest levels of income inequality were found, in the last decade, in countries such as the Central African Republic, Honduras, Angola, Haiti, South Africa and Namibia. 
In the late 2000s, Chile had the highest GINI coefficient, after taxes and transfers, among OECD member countries. The United States, Turkey and Mexico came right before it.
Read more
(Posted Under Creative Commons License: Attribution Share Alike)
Huffington Post recently published an infographic depicting "the mind blowing" reality of US income inequity.

Pay special attention to the bottom 90 percent of Americans, who collectively held just a little more than half of the nation's wealth in 2010, all while the wealthiest 0.01 percent held nearly five percent. It's a stark divide many too easily forget.
income distribution

The infographic a very basic, yet effective exposition of information that will follow. It provides a quick reference message and it delivers the message effectively.   For those who are not averse to data and charts, there is more to come. Much of what's to come is poignant in delivering a message, "Income inequity is a problem that will eventually boil-over like an overflowing pot of your mother's Oatmeal."

There is one glaring message from the infographic that relates to current budget deliberations. We suggest among other more drastic recommendations, removal of the Social Security Cap for the Top 20% to 30% income earners. The 2013 social security (payroll tax) maximum is $113,700. The maximum has been increased annually for many years. Why are people who earning at the higher income levels 'excused' from paying a tax most of us pay throughout the year?

Why are these income earners exempt from 

payroll taxes when their 
income reaches $113,700?
Basically, income earners on left side of the infographic could pay Social Security taxes throughout the year in support of maintaining solvency of Social Security well into the 22nd Century. Higher income tax rates for the top income earners is another fair way of leveling the disparity 'playing field' while maintaining a hands-off the actual reality of income inequity. The vast majority of Americans do not resent the earnings of the uber wealthy, Those same people, however, may find the current tax rates somewhat offensive and unfair. 

Speaking in terms of fairness is not a viable option for the GOP as it smacks against its unwritten, but existential role of guardians of all things wealthy and majordomo (P) of any measure that facilitates conducting business in America. If you need an example consider Eric Cantor's persistent attacks on the Fair Labor Standards Act. (Cantor would sponsor a bill to lessen the need for companies to pay Overtime work at tine and one-half). US Citizens contribution via income taxes to Cantors $194,000 plus House Leader congressional; compensation. Do you actually believe such a measure would work for the betterment of the family, as Cantor claims? Is it possible many companies will abuse such law? I posit such law will actually work to widen American income inequity. How about a bill to improve job creation or job development. 

We are committed to our position that income inequity is a metastasized economic cancer from political policy of the early 1980s.


An unavoidable digression.
Who was president in the early 1980s?

Another consideration of 'life' handed to the middle and lower income strata: spending leading to our current debt and deficits. 

Which US Presidents contributed most to our current financial woes?
Excuse the digression, let's get back to income "trickle-down" economics.